How is Airbyte different from Meltano?

Another open-source tool is Meltano, which is based on Singer. Meltano is a lab from Gitlab trying to fix some of Singer’s shortcomings. 

The following aspects about Meltano make it different from Airbyte:

  • Outdated connectors: Meltano is limited by Singer’s own outdated connectors. 
  • Standardization: Meltano uses Singer’s approach of turning each connector into an open-source project, which makes standardization and quality enforcement difficult. Airbyte, on the other hand, has a mono-repo in order to ensure standardization and ease of maintenance across all the connectors developed. 
  • Interface: Meltano is a CLI-first product, while Airbyte offers a UI and has an API-first approach.
  • Replication Capabilities: Airbyte supports log-based Change Data Capture (CDC) for your data replication needs and supports data lakes as destination connectors.
  • Speed of Execution: Meltano is only maintained by a handful of maintainers and as a Gitlab lab, might limit its scope to what is interesting to Gitlab. Airbyte is venture-funded and has a growing team.
  • Community: Airbyte has an active contributor community that is growing significantly faster than Meltano’s.

Share This answer

Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
John Lafleur's profile on Astorik

John Lafleur

Co-founder & COO at Airbyte
Co-founder Airbyte, the new open-source standard for data integration! Ex-CEO of Codingame (now 2M developers). Author at SDTimes, Linux, Dzone.

Tools Mentioned